Ralph Demonstrates How He Will Make It Look Like an Accident.
Koeman
leaves for the Everton millions. OK –
who are we getting…?
Frank
de Boer – promising – great player – high profile… Nope.
Manuel
Pellegrini – class and charisma – high profile…. Nope.
Claude
Puel – who? Oh, ok then... In Les we trust etc
Claude
came in after the successful Ronald Koeman left for Everton and immediately
changed the whole ethos of the playing side of the club suddenly we went from
every team playing a 4-2-3-1 formation with a pressing game to playing the
diamond midfield where we sat back and built up slow. One reason that you don't change the ethos is
because you need a different type of player to play any new system and we
didn't have the players to play the diamond midfield. Another reason is if the previous system had
proved successful. This change was on
top of there being a European Championships so there was even less time for the
new manager to get his ideas across in the summer.
So,
we started sluggishly and had two very boring home draws against Watford and
against Sunderland. In the Sunderland game in particular we were very lucky to
get a point with the goalkeeper falling over a J-Rod shot with five minutes to
go. He persisted with this formation at the start of the season and we had
Charlie Austin trying to cover up and down the left wing which isn’t his game
at all and Nathan Redmond totally failing to be the new Thierry Henry at the
point of the diamond. This was the first
time I had the nagging feeling that things we’re going to be a bit bumpy.
We had couple of wins at home against poor sides like Middlesbrough and Swansea which made things look ok but on the flip side of that, we would throw away games at Hull and Burnley with our lack of ambition once behind. Half an hour to score and we don't even manage a shot on target nor ever give the impression that we were actually going for it. In the odd game we looked good like West Ham away when we won 3-0 playing some really good slick football with good running off the ball.
Then the European games started and Claude went into rotation mode and with it, any pattern and understandings between players went out the window. Rotation mode made it seem like he
planned the whole thing out on the spreadsheet in advance and it wasn't so much
mix and match but it was an A Team and a B team. At the weekends we played the
first team (Cedric, Jose, Bertrand with Virgil) and in Europe we more or less played the B team (Cuco, Maya, McQueen with Virgil), with only really Virgil
and Oriol Romeu being fixtures in both line-ups. Claude’s CV boasted a lot of
European experience which was the main justification from Les Reed for taking
on someone who was new to English football and a virtual unknown on these
shores. This European expertise brought us to a good position in the group
after four games and a famous win against and admittedly declining Inter Milan.
We had got a hard earned 0-0 against Hapoel Be’er Sheva and suffered a very
unlucky 1-0 defeat in Milan when the Italians scored with their only shot on
target after we had missed literally shit loads. The home form in Europe was
good having dispatched a piss poor Sparta Prague side three nil and as
mentioned, beating Milan. Seven points from four games and we only needed one
win from the final two games to get through.
It
was in the away match at Sparta Prague where Claude’s truly negative mindset
first came to the fore. As per the spreadsheet he picked what was basically a
reserve side and we lost in one of the worst performances I have ever seen. As
the season went on, I used the phrase ‘one of the worst performances I've ever
seen’ quite often. We could have gone
for it in that game, got qualified and rested everyone in the last game… but
no. Be’er Sheva at home and a 0-0 draw
would've got us through. The fact that
we could have got through with a 0-0 was a dangerous thing and we played for
it, committing no bodies forward and sure as shit, Hapoel predictably scored
with their first shot on target meaning that we had 10 minutes to score 2
goals. It was only then that Virgil took it upon itself to go and play as a
striker and he scored to make it 1-1 but too little too late. The great
European master tactician had totally fucked it up. I can't imagine that his
next meeting with Les Reed was a particularly pleasant one.
Undeterred,
Claude got us through to a Wembley final, masterminding a quarter final win at
The Emirates when we played more first teamers than Arsenal and did the
business 2-0. Then a two legged semi
against a Mané-less Liverpool and we defended deep and well and nicked both
legs 1-0. Tactical masterclass, executed
to perfection. Jurgen Klopp and the
ex-Saints at Anfield put back in their boxes.
Brilliant.
In
between the semi-finals, Virgil had got injured and José Fonte had followed the
money so we were forced to play your Yoshida and Stephens as the central
defenders and after shocking home game against West Ham we did actually change
to the formation we've been using for the last three years with two holding
midfielders. We had a bit of success with that including a very good
performance at Wembley when we should have won but ultimately, defensive
frailties cost us. The feel-good factor
was there though – the fans had a fantastic day and the team and Claude did us
proud. The trouble was just beginning
though.
As
soon as Claude felt that the central defenders were more solid, he ditched the
4-2-3-1 and we went back to the 4-3-3, the one-striker-in-the box-if-we're-lucky formation. We didn't have much to play for post Wembley so it was down to
the manager to get the most out of the players he had and Claude spectacularly failed, judging by the number of completely half-assed boring
performances we put in. We didn’t ever
look like getting sucked into a relegation battle but there were very few
points between 8th and 16th and we could have finished
anywhere in that range. We mulled along,
getting the odd win against crap sides like Sunderland and Watford but then it
tailed off again.
Despite
all this, I was still in favour of Claude staying because of the stability of
having a manager for the second season would bring but then we played Hull City
at home. Hull were a team who hardly had
a point away from home all season. They set up for a draw, they didn't attack
at all and we did absolutely fuck all. We still only played with the one
upfront so on 60 minutes Claude took Gabbiadini off and put Shane Long on, a
like for like change that would achieve absolutely nothing. If ever there was a
game to put two strikers on then that was it. The fact that we missed a penalty
in the last minute meant that his lack of bravery and was not hidden and the cracks
were not papered over. It's worth pointing out that that penalty was not won by
flooding the opposition box and putting them under ridiculous pressure, it was
won by one of the Hull players having a complete meltdown and throwing someone
over for no reason at all.
Two
wins in the last eight games against the beach bound West Brom team and an
already relegated diabolical bag of shite from Middlesbrough does not make
things any better and nor does the fact that we finished eighth, top of the
absolutely shite division within the Premier League. We played a lot of good
sides at the end but in Koeman’s last season we picked up points against all of
the big clubs. This this season, we
didn't even have a go. We turned up with no plan whatsoever in any of the
matches and when you tot it up over the season, we came out of 12 games against
the top six with a very poor three points, from two 0-0’s against Liverpool and
a 0-0 against United.
And
so we arrived at the last game of the season against Stoke when there was
nothing riding on the game whatsoever and there was no reason to not go for it
but what do we do, same as usual, same selection, same tactics and we got the
same result. No goals. The final tactical substitution of the season, 1-0 down,
10 to go, was to take off our best to set piece taker and replace him with a full-back
in midfield. I fucking give up - The season had ended with 5 home games in which
we failed to score in.
It
is often said that a team will mimic the personality of its manager and that's
been the case with us this season. We are an overly cautious, boring team with
no inspiration whatsoever and we are scared. How is the team going to function
well if it scared of expressing itself? There was barely a plan A in most of
the games aside from play deep, pass it around sideways and backwards work it
out to the wings and then cross it. The trouble was that there was only ever
one player in the box with three cautious midfielders not getting in to
help.
I'm
convinced that the whole season was run off a spreadsheet and there was
absolutely no dynamism in any decisions that were made depending on the state
of the game or what was required at that time. If something wasn't working then
we just carried on and exactly the same fashion in the hope that it would
change and of course, it hardly ever did. For example, we have done virtually the whole
season without having two strikers playing as strikers. Even in the
early-season diamond formation that was supposed to have two strikers upfront, they usually played wide, so at times it looked like we had no strikers
at all and six midfielders.
There
are a few things that have happened this season that have not been Claude’s
fault and could be used as mitigating circumstances. Whoever decided that Long,
Austin and J-Rod were going to score as many goals as Pellé and Mané managed
last season wants shooting. J-Rod and Austin always have injury problems and Long
had just had the season of his life which was totally out of character so it
was unlikely to happen again. We also
had Jose Fonte behaving like a dickhead and we had the unfortunate injury to Virgil
which the board failed to address in the January transfer window. They
eventually addressed both the striker and defender issues with the signings of
Gabbiadini in the window and Caceres just afterwards at not inconsiderable
expense but Claude chose to use the 68 cap Uruguay international once,
presumably because he wasn’t on the ‘End of January’ spreadsheet. This was ok though because the defence was in
top form. That’s a lie.
There
have been too many stories about the players clashing with the manager for none
of it to be true. There have been visible shows of dissent in matches from
Shane Long, Pierre Højbjerg, James Ward-Prowse, Nathan Redmond and Ryan
Bertrand. What's gone on on the training ground is anyone's guess. Then we had the bizarre episode of Ralph Krueger addressing players before the Everton away game which turned out to be Jose Fonte's last game. We had the Tadic issue - he was repeatedly being subbed and rightly so, he moaned int he media and from then on he was hardly ever subbed even though his form got worse - weak management there. Some players
have undoubtably improved under the manager like Romeu and Yoshida and it's
been good to see players like McQueen, Sims and Stephens given the chance.
However,
regardless of where we finish in the league and the positives and mitigating
factors, I have grown increasingly tired of a piss boring style of football,
players being picked time and time again when they are not performing, players
getting dropped having played well and the complete lack of dynamism in the
decision-making. I also do not think that Claude has it within himself to
change and feel that even he if he had the best squad of players in the world,
the football would still be incredibly boring.
I find it amazing that he had a reputation for attacking football in
France. All I can do is judge him on what I’ve seen this season.
Then
there’s the interviews. Jesus H.
Christ. Now, Claude’s English is better
than my French but I think that I’d manage to be more interesting and engaging
than Claude was. ‘Oportuniteeee’ and ‘Qualiteeee’
25 times. Get a translator and then at
least everyone would have some idea what was going through your head. It was Jan Poortvliet all over again with his
‘we know how to make a goal’ after yet another 0 in the goals-for column. Even Jan didn’t manage 5 home games without
scoring and he had David McGoaldrought up front.
I
think he deserves to go and I think he will.
In these days of football clubs being big business, I wonder what the
season-ticket take up is for next season. You will of course have your fans who
will buy regardless of how the team plays but like them or not, there are a
load of fans who just want to be entertained and will not be renewing based on
what they’ve seen this year. The run to
the Cup Final was fantastic and a great day was had by all. When the dust settles on this, Claude’s
record will say 8th in the League and the EFL Cup Final. It’s not like he’s failed and he’ll get a
good job next (St.Etienne has been rumoured already) and his season in English
football will look ok on his CV. The
question that the board have to answer is whether they think he’ll improve next
season or will it fall away further?
There is a very small margin between us finishing 8th and
having a relegation battle. I feel that
next year with Claude in charge, we’d struggle near the bottom, even though the
league outside the top 7 is very poor.
The
bottom line is (and this is the way you should judge any manager) – did he get
the best out of the resources at his disposal?
I’m afraid there’s only one answer to that one for me and it's no.
Au
Revoir Claude.