What are these "Rules" You Speak Of
This was written on the evening of Thursday 7th June 2017 – it all may have changed by the time you read it.
So, I thought that I’d have a bit of a
break from writing about Saints. As I
write Claude is still a dead man walking and the transfer window isn’t open.
Do you want the long version or the short
version?
Okay, short version. Liverpool tapped up
Virgil, Saints got the arse and reported them to the Premier League and then
Liverpool knew that they were guilty as hell and apologised and pulled out of the
chase in the hope that the Premier League didn't impose sanctions.
The even shorter version is that Liverpool
are cunts.
The full version is that news broke on
Monday from several Liverpool media outlets that Virgil van Dijk had indicated
that he wanted to join Liverpool as opposed to joining Chelsea or Manchester
City or heaven forbid, staying at Southampton. In the normal scheme of things,
no one as good as he is would choose to join Liverpool ahead of Chelsea or
Manchester City. The media world was in
a frenzy with the BBC writing a piece to declare that Virgil would be signing
for Liverpool as he indicated that as its preference. It was written in the usual style of ‘Big
club gets what they wants, small club doesn’t matter – just accept it and be
grateful’.
Woah boy - Hang on just a goddam minute,
he's got five years left of his contract to run and Saints categorically said
they do not need to sell and that we don’t want to sell. Then more details began
to emerge and they were that Virgil was swayed by Jurgen Klopp’s personal involvement
in trying to sign him. Wow, hang on a fucking minute. So, if this is to believed,
the manager of Liverpool has got personally involved in trying to sign a player
that he had no permission to speak to and so M’lud, one must logically conclude
that this is a clear case of tapping up and that my friends, is against the
rules.
My head was already racing with all this
going round and I actually had a short Twitter exchange with Phil McNulty, who
is the head of sport at the BBC and writer of the BBC article. I have an issue with the BBC reporting
gossip, what with it being funded by licence fees and all that but all he was
interested in was the Liverpool side of the story regarding them being the club
the Virgil wanted to join. I said to him that surely the tapping up angle was
the story here as Liverpool have already picked up a ban from signing use
players for using underhand inducements to a 12-year-old. In other walks of
life but that’s called grooming. McNulty wasn’t interested in the slightest in
that angle and just arrogantly signed off with a condescending, we'll see and
I'm convinced that I'm right attitude.
In the meantime we had to tolerate a
ridiculous amount of arsehole Liverpool fanbase gloating and the Liverpool
media waving their collective dicks around.
“Oh my God, a player has decided to join us ahead of Manchester City and
Chelsea, it's the Klopp effect… We are on our way back… We’re the biggest and
best club in the land… You’ll Never Walk Alone…. Fuck off!!!
From a Saints fan angle, of course we
were all thinking that the board had caved in yet again and despite saying they
didn't need to sell, they were going to sell to the first bidder who came along,
directly contradicting what Ralph Krueger had said in an interview about a week
ago.
On Tuesday, the Saints board had
obviously met and the local Daily Echo journalists then ran a story saying that
Saints had got the right arse over the reports and had asked the Premier League
to investigate if Liverpool had it done anything wrong. Talk about negotiating from a position of
strength as they obviously had.
In the meantime, John Cross of The Daily
Mirror, never the most reliable of publications, had printed details of
Liverpool flying Virgil to Blackpool of all places to meet Juergen Klopp and
then receiving several text messages afterwards regarding the potential move. I
don't know whether all of this was true but if it was, the personal involvement
of Klopp was going to be like a noose around Liverpool’s neck. Phil McNulty the
BBC didn't get back to me after that despite my repeated goading on Twitter.
‘Hi Phil, remember me from yesterday…”
Wednesday went by and then at about 5 o'clock came the glorious moment...
“We apologise to the owner, board of directors and fans of Southampton for any misunderstanding regarding Virgil van Dijk"
“We respect Southampton's position and can confirm we have ended any interest in the player.”
Apparently it was a
misunderstanding – misunderstanding my big fat hairy arse. What a shower of
cunts. With a grovelling apology, came the news that the Premier League would
be dropping the investigation. This is of course the only reason that Liverpool
apologised in the first place because they fucking knew they were guilty but
good old John Cross from the Mirror, who is my new journalistic hero, went to
print again to say that Southampton still wanted the Premier League to investigate
and the most interesting part of that was that apparently, other clubs were
lining up behind Saints to give Liverpool a kicking.
Then of course, all the dodgy deeds of
the past came falling out of the woodwork to remind everyone what a scummy
operation Liverpool is. The near
identical tactics to try and sign Clint Dempsey from Fulham a few years ago –
tap up, get reported, apologise. They
are like the football equivalent of Katie Hopkins who has a modus operandii of
‘Tweet a load of shit, delete it once everyone’s read it and then
apologise’. Liverpool only apologise
when they get caught. So, get your
popcorn and watch this space.
The investigation into Liverpool transfer
dealings should absolutely still take place.
No way should this be brushed under the carpet. The player has been unsettled and that is
specifically what the rules are supposed to prevent. Saints now have to deal
with, unhappy player who has responded in textbook fashion by changing his
Twitter bio in removing a picture of him in a Saints shirt and replacing it
with one in a Holland shirt and changing the sentence ‘professional player with
Southampton FC’ to ‘professional player’. We also have to deal with the fact
that our captain, whilst he has been injured and getting fit again, has being
fucking off to meet Juergen Klopp to try and try and arrange a transfer for
himself. So, in short, he's acting like a right wanker and so there are bridges
to be built there.
Where it leaves us with Virgil is anyone's
guess – he could still leave for elsewhere but we have to applaud the board for
standing firm and striking a blow for the little guy. Another sale to Liverpool would have been too
much and I think that they knew that.
Virgil changing agent in the middle of last season to the Wasserman
Group (I think they’re called) was always going to make things more difficult
for Saints and their role in all this is an interesting angle as well. Maybe he’ll throw them under a bus and that
could be a way to repair any damage done.
I really hope that the Premier League
throw the book at Liverpool and they get something like being banned from
making any transfers for the next three transfer windows. It would serve the
bastards right. The arrogance of Liverpool and in particular, Juergen Klopp
staggering. He is an over-hyped bang average manager who in four attempts
against us last year, in a year when we really weren’t very good, couldn't even
get his team to score one fucking goal.
The irony is that we are probably getting rid of our manager because we
weren’t very good at scoring goals. It's
unbelievable that Klopp had these meetings and messages with Virgil in the
first place. He knows the rules but the arrogant fucker obviously didn't think
they applied to him. Yes they fucking do, dickhead. Hopefully the ‘Klopp effect’ will mean that
they can’t sign anyone for a while.
The LFC Media is interesting to
read. The ‘proper’ papers like the
Liverpool Echo are up in arms at their incompetence and really fearful of the
consequences and incredulous at what Liverpool had done which is bad enough to
trigger the complaint and subsequent embarrassing grovelling apology. Of course, the
media that poses as pseudo-official is still talking in delusional tones about
how they could still sign him. Are they
for real? The tone of the Liverpool fans
on Twitter has somewhat changed – some directing anger at their owners, some at
Saints obviously because we should just roll over and let him join a bigger
club but strangely, none directed at their manager. Having to issue an apology (apparently Saints
insisted on it being public) is crushingly embarrassing but on it’s own it’s
not enough. They’ve done that
before. Katie Hopkins is still using the
same tactics.
Let us not kid ourselves that tapping up
doesn't go on, of course it does but Liverpool have obviously crossed the line
here in their absolute desperation to get back to where they used to be. Saints
will have known that Liverpool were talking to him – anyone who thinks
otherwise is delusional. Whatever
happens now, the constant procession of transfers from Southampton to Liverpool
is over for a long time and they are going to have to be squeaky clean with
every transfer deal they do from now on because if any selling club suspects
anything, they are going to be straight in touch with the Premier League. Ironically, there will probably be a massive
rush for Liverpool to get other deals over the line before they get a transfer
ban. Make it happen Premier League.
Summer as a Saints fan – never a dull
moment – and the transfer window isn’t even open yet.
In case you were wondering, Phil McNulty, Senior BBC Sports Writer, is still not returning my calls.
If Liverpool Was a Person
Transfer ban - and, a 10 point deduction to kick their season off
ReplyDeleteOh at least - Ban for 3 windows, huge fine for the club, huge fine for Klopp...
DeleteTop post as ever!!
ReplyDeleteThanks Anon... :)
DeleteRules don't apply to the big clubs, on or off the pitch... I'd love there to be consequences as this is so blatant, but I fully expect that somebody with money will talk to somebody else with money and money will win, one way or another.
ReplyDeleteNormally I'd agree with you but they've already been banned once for the 12 year old thing so someone at the Premier League obviously has balls. It's a whole different thing imposing a punishment on the 1st team though
Delete